ADBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 17.09%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $539.21, signalling upside risk potential of 42.71%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $377.96 which suggests that it could grow by 39.09%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Salesforce.

Adobe has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.323%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.89x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 42.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.63x versus 6.98x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of -8.72%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $539.21, signalling upside risk potential of 42.71%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $407.72 which suggests that it could grow by 22.61%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Adobe has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.529%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.89x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.63x versus 20.90x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 34.62%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $539.21, signalling upside risk potential of 42.71%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.75 which suggests that it could grow by 33.79%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Microsoft.

Adobe has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.89x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.63x versus 10.81x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 31.69% compared to Adobe's net margin of 20.78%. Adobe's return on equity of 46.85% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $539.21, signalling upside risk potential of 42.71%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $185.66 which suggests that it could grow by 25.74%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Oracle.

Adobe has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.149%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Adobe's net income of $1.8B is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.89x while Oracle's PE ratio is 34.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.63x versus 7.56x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.